Back to Home

ATM Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | Amateur Telescope Making | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
RE: Diagram It

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Walt Hamler on April 20, 2000 00:01:40 UTC

I did this sort of thing when I made my 8"f/5 many years ago, along with the custom made focuser that held the camera only fractions of an inch above the tube. That was for photography, and as I remember, I was shooting for 100% illumination over a 1.3" circle so that the edge falloff would be minimal at the corners. It worked, as I have lots of slides/negs that show very little falloff.
My current 10" is intended for visual only, and I don`t plan on any exotic wide field eyepieces for the immediate future, so my 1.95" diagonal provides 100% for a reasonable fov. I just found the number of baffles the CAD program called for a little "amusing". If I were really concerned that I had a problem in that area I would go the flocked paper route also, but again was shocked at how expensive that stuff has gotten. I guess I`ve become an curmudgeon (sp?)!!

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins