Re: LX 200 8 - an Astronomy Net Meade Equipment Forum Message

Meade Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Meade Equipment Discussion \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Re: LX 200 8

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Graham on January 27, 2001 11:03:12 UTC

As far as I know optically both telescope are identicle, both using the smae tube ( in the LX 8 Inch)/ . The difference seems to be in the built in database which is far greater in the LX200 which has 64,359 objects in it, opposed to the LX90 autostar which has (only!) 30,000.
The LX 200 is recommended over the 90 for those who intend to do such things as deep-space observing, CCD imaging or astrophotogaphy.

My advive would be to go for the LX200 if you can afford it. If not the LX90 is still a beauty!

Follow Ups:

Re: Re: LX 200 8 - vanzyl - February 2, 2001 - 11:08 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins