![]() |
|
![]() |
||||
|
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
P.S.
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Daniel Johnson on January 26, 2003 21:42:58 UTC |
Although the LX 90 is not really meant for long exposures, and although its lack of periodic error correction and weaker fork arms make it inferior to other scopes for that purpose, 20 years ago it would have been considered an astrophotographer's dream. If visual work is your interest, and if you're SURE it will be your primary interest for years to come, the LX90 is a bargain. But it's a lot more work than an LX200 for photography.
|
|
Additional Information |
---|
![]() |
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |