My dear Adam,
How one defines their God also defines the height of their intellect at that time.
One major problem with the theory you describe is that it dose not fit in to the definition of God. God is supposed to be the creator and not the other way round. The language or the dictionary meaning in the theory you introduce is completely the other way round.
What you are suggesting is that somehow we created us and forgot how!
This notion is far from the meaning of what it takes to be God. God is absolute and perfect in every way and is infinite and is not made but has always existed. It is only us who, in time get to know God better through discussions like this and through our experience with the creator God. Our own minds and other senses, not being able to preserve God because God is infinite and we are finite, always try to equate god with the attributes that God has bestowed upon us. Now the our attributes that we find within ourselves that are similar to that of our creator God are invisible but never the less they exist. The same attributes exist within a vassal, our bodies and all its inward parts, and our bodies being finite, try to reach God in a physical way which is impossible so it being confused in wanting to reach out to its creator constantly and mistakenly interprets objects of sorts or theories that relate the physical world to God and equates them with a sort of a god because that object or physical theory has been created by the body in order to comfort its deficiency and or pain of being separated from its creator spiritually since it has not recognized its own spirit within itself in order to communicate with the real God and see the real God with an unconfused mind.
Dose this help?
As ever humble