I would have to say the third option is the most accurate, based on my opinion that there is no ultimate truth. It's not like one day there will be a newspaper headline reading GOD EXISTS! The search for the truth is a gradual thing that essentially leads to nothing other than more progress, knowledge, and technology.

• No headlines... - rggarfinkle - August 30, 2001 - 21:46 UTC
  • I think, there is likely no "final truth". - alexander - August 30, 2001 - 22:09 UTC
    • This is good, but... - rggarfinkle - August 31, 2001 - 04:34 UTC
    • The final truth is: EXISTENCE - dolphin - August 31, 2001 - 07:32 UTC
      • Absolute Beauty - rggarfinkle - August 31, 2001 - 14:39 UTC
        • Yes, symetries (beauty) are the origin of all natural laws. - alexander - August 31, 2001 - 16:58 UTC
          • Symmetries are part of group theory - harvey1 - August 31, 2001 - 17:08 UTC
            • Harvey, what axiom do you need for symetry of time? - alexander - August 31, 2001 - 17:17 UTC
              • Well... - harvey1 - August 31, 2001 - 20:41 UTC
        • Thanks Rob/ Alex; 3 in 1 pattern in time, too - dolphin - September 1, 2001 - 04:21 UTC
      • What about a materialist answer about existence? - harvey1 - August 31, 2001 - 17:06 UTC
        • Harvey, you again put horse behind carriage. - alexander - August 31, 2001 - 17:52 UTC
          • Does this horse have a tail? - harvey1 - August 31, 2001 - 21:01 UTC
            • Harv, Alex: interesting debate! - dolphin - September 2, 2001 - 10:52 UTC
• That's depressing. - pyxis - August 31, 2001 - 15:34 UTC