Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Carl Sagan Was Acutely Astute :)

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Luis Hamburgh on August 30, 2001 18:25:46 UTC


Not everyone places more credence, per se, in one being than in any other. It is the *methodology* -- not the methodologist -- that atheists embrace. Sure, we may believe one person's educated opinion over another's, based on his track record, but this does not mean we perfunctorily buy into anything that person says.

Religious folks, even non-religion specific theists, see the ultimate source of knowledge and power as a sentient 'being.' This causes theists, in my opinion, to assume others tend to see a discipline's validity as a function of its practitioneers (i.e, its 'beings'). Therefore, when an atheist cites an example given by another atheist, that atheist is incorrectly criticized for believing he "can only believe what was published by (whomever)."

Carl Sagan was a wonderful author, and many of his works are quoted by folks like me to express a given view. This, however, does not mean that I drop all discretion and automatically "believe what I want to believe" everytime I read Sagan!


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins