Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Hello

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on July 27, 2001 15:31:48 UTC

Dick,

I just wanted to point out to all that I'm not saying there aren't deep perplexities within the philosophy of science. I started to realize that maybe someone might construe my objections to your views as stating that these problems you are addressing don't exist. That is not true (so I gave a series of questions that I don't think there are satisfying answers).

For brevity, I just want to reply to your last comment (and another time maybe we can talk about those other philosophical questions):

>>>And, I have no idea why you think of me as supporting "anti-realism" when my whole treatise concerns the issue of determining what is real! I personally would call the refusal to investigate my work to be "anti-realist".

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2019 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins