At Least You Are Willing To Think About It. - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

At Least You Are Willing To Think About It.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard D. Stafford, Ph.D. on July 24, 2001 20:12:01 UTC

Mario,

>>>All I'm saying is that our current scientific beliefs are the most accurate so far.>If you are right in your beliefs, and you may be, then science will go up a notch.> But until then, especially for people like me without the mathematical background to understand everything you say, it must be taken one step at a time. >I openly admit that our current science is not totally right and never will be. But I try to avoid jumping to conclusions

Follow Ups:

Let me take a whack at it - stormcrow - July 24, 2001 - 23:58 UTC
- Here we go - stormcrow - July 25, 2001 - 02:58 UTC
  - I made a typo - stormcrow - July 25, 2001 - 03:09 UTC
  - Can we look again? - doctordick - July 25, 2001 - 17:31 UTC
    - You've got to be pragmatic - stormcrow - July 26, 2001 - 13:14 UTC
      - Isn't rational more important than pragmatic? - aurino - July 26, 2001 - 16:15 UTC
        
        The epistemological problem exists - harvey1 - July 26, 2001 - 20:24 UTC
        
        Glad to hear that - aurino - July 26, 2001 - 20:58 UTC
        
        Some points of departure - harvey1 - July 26, 2001 - 22:04 UTC
        
        Some thoughts - aurino - July 27, 2001 - 13:40 UTC
        
        I think you understand a lot more than most. - doctordick - July 27, 2001 - 17:49 UTC
        
        Since I've been mentioned - harvey1 - July 27, 2001 - 19:29 UTC
        
        Kuhn reference (correction) - harvey1 - July 27, 2001 - 19:31 UTC
        
        (i.Assuming if the right experiment were done! - doctordick - July 29, 2001 - 15:01 UTC
        
        Don't get me wrong - harvey1 - July 27, 2001 - 14:52 UTC
        
        Don't worry about that - aurino - July 27, 2001 - 16:15 UTC
        
        The meaning of life - stormcrow - July 27, 2001 - 16:36 UTC
        
        How about curiosity? - doctordick - July 27, 2001 - 18:54 UTC
        
        When you read - harvey1 - July 27, 2001 - 21:22 UTC
        
        When I read... - stormcrow - July 28, 2001 - 00:54 UTC
        
        FAPP - harvey1 - July 27, 2001 - 17:42 UTC
        
        I consider myself an absolute realist! - doctordick - July 27, 2001 - 14:22 UTC
        
        Hello - harvey1 - July 27, 2001 - 15:31 UTC
Fair and accurate - yanniru - July 26, 2001 - 12:44 UTC
- Talk about surreal conversations! - doctordick - July 26, 2001 - 17:32 UTC
  - My guess is that others are as convinces as I - yanniru - July 26, 2001 - 21:06 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins