Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Opps. Regression Contradictions And The Lot

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard Ruquist on July 23, 2001 23:06:35 UTC

First you tell me that symmetries are required. Then you tell me that any conceivable symmetry falls out of your equation. And now you tell me that it's all completely undefined. All I can think of is charlatan. Can't you at least remember what you have said.

By the way, definition is equivalent to assumption. I will not let you wiggle out of your own inconsistencies and contradiction by invoking definition.

But ir's all in fun. In fact, it's just getting funnier all the time. I love it.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins