Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
SC

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on July 23, 2001 16:58:12 UTC

Hi Dick,

>>>"If reality is entirely unknown, then why bother making any assumptions about it - so what's there to discuss?" D: Apparently you have no concept of "working with an unknown". How do you think you came to know anything?>H: "Dick, with possibly the exception of Alex, you have been one of the most bold in saying 'I know that my model is correct'" D: If it is not, you should be able o show me where the error is. Mine is a logically constructed model, having absolutely nothing to do with what reality actually is: i.e., "a pure consequence of definition". As such, it provides a starting place to logically consider the question of "what is reality".

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins