But you claim to not have made any. But in a recent post you admitted that some things, you did not call them assumptions, were required.

I think you have done a great thing. But you have made assumptions. And until you admit that we are at am impass. It's the same impass that others who know math have discussed with you.

I think the great thing you have done is to show how much physical law comes from simple symmetries. But the symmetries are assumptions, not requirements. Mathematics without postulates is uncomputable. And your work is definitely computable.

As far as I can tell everyone who understands math and has read your work agrees with what I just said. Your concern that this may influence those on this forum who do not understand math suggests to me that you are more interested in admiration than truth.