I Didn't Mean It To Be A Universal Message - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

I Didn't Mean It To Be A Universal Message

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Mario Dovalina on July 12, 2001 19:00:07 UTC

"You can't prove a=b wrong based exclusively on X's definitions, all you can do is prove that if a=b is true then X is wrong and vice-versa."

Absolutely, I agree. It was certainly a message primarily for Fundamentalists here, like Motumos and Copernicus, though they haven't posted here in a little while, maybe they got scared off. Oh well, there's always Jisbond...

I didn't mean to attack the general notion of God, just ONE specific one. I know that my argument will have no impact on posters like you, Harv, or Paul, and I didn't intend it to. Fundamentalism is a lot easier to disprove, so I decided to have a little fun with it.

Follow Ups:

a little fun with it ? ( IT = "FIRE"? ) - jisbond - July 13, 2001 - 03:43 UTC
- Don't make assumptions about me - stormcrow - July 13, 2001 - 04:49 UTC
- Let IT come - aurino - July 13, 2001 - 13:21 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins