Paul,

Sorry, but I think you are barking up the wrong tree here! I do not believe yanniru has the mental faculties to follow my work.

Please let me know if my analysis of Richards capabilities seems unrealistic.

Thanks, Dick

To Richard et.al.,

With regard to your posts on this thread, either you are a complete idiot or someone else is posting under your name!
See:

http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/8095.shtml?base=30

"If I Were An Angel "
Posted by Richard David Yannopoulos-Ruquist, on May 1, 2001 23:08:35 UTC

Posted in response to my thought problem presented in.

http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/8070.shtml?base=30&disp=0

which was a wasted attempt by me to clarify to you the nature of the problem I have solved. A problem which has clearly eluded you.

By the way, my point that any concept of reality may be represented by a set of numbers is in no way laid aside by your ridiculous example

>>>His error is to claim that it applies to any set of numbers. Suppose we choose for our set the number one. That qualifies as any set of numbers. Can you show me how his fundamental equation follows from that set?