Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
"Universal" Time

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics
Posted by Mike Banks on June 28, 2001 08:36:09 UTC

For a moment let's assume there was a big bang. Since time is slowed down at higher velocity or gravity, then wouldn't the rate of time been very fast in the first billion years of the big bang as compared to our time on earth? Do scientists consider this when calculating the age of the universe after the big bang? If not, then I would think the universe to be less older, using earth time, than previously thought. Or would calculating the rate of expansion not affect this?

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins