(For those of you who read both, this is a duplicate of a post I just put on counterbalance.org)

Hi Alan(17934934),

Sorry about missing your post. I find this forum to be rather poorly designed. The design of the forum at astronomy.net makes it much easier to tell if you have read a post or not. Here, you almost have to read them all to see if you have missed one. Since I had gone to Europe for about 3 weeks in June (and complications aranging the trip took me away a lot the last week of May) the 'new' tags had expired and there was no way for me to find what I missed. Astronomy.net was also pretty bad but I think I found most of those though.

>>>I wonder if you'll ever read this?>You go too far in my opinion; because you claim (do you not?) that your model of reality contains ALL reality.> That is impossible just from set theory: Something that REPRESENTS reality must be a subset of reality. If it is different enough from reality to be called a 'model'; and not to be called 'reality'; to be so distinct from reality must make it less than, and a subset of, reality.

• Mental Models of Reality - paulm - June 20, 2001 - 19:47 UTC
  • Hi Paul! - doctordick - June 20, 2001 - 21:47 UTC