Are A,B,C Moving Points Or 3 Moving Reference Systems (xyzt)? - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Are A,B,C Moving Points Or 3 Moving Reference Systems (xyzt)?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on May 7, 2001 16:08:14 UTC

Because u do not need 3 systems to derive Lorentz transformations, just 2 is enough (third will give u exactly the same result).

Follow Ups:

'Tau' shall not confuse your neighbor - aurino - May 7, 2001 - 18:35 UTC
- It doesn't matter what the sign is in the numerator. - bruce - May 7, 2001 - 21:36 UTC
  - That turned out bad - bruce - May 7, 2001 - 21:39 UTC
Mathematics "is" organized thinking. - doctordick - May 8, 2001 - 14:03 UTC
- I know more than you think - aurino - May 8, 2001 - 20:38 UTC
- U can get all relativity from invariance of space-time interval. - alexander - May 8, 2001 - 22:36 UTC
  - You're right Alex - aurino - May 9, 2001 - 12:47 UTC
    - Actually... - aurino - May 9, 2001 - 12:48 UTC
- Lorentz equations - rbwinn - May 9, 2001 - 22:01 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2025 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins