Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
AKA Logic And Mathematics

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on April 27, 2001 20:31:21 UTC

Dick,

Aren't you just identifying logic and mathematics as 'true' because they are self-consistent? The trouble is that there are paradoxes in logic and mathematics that are not resolvable. In addition (no pun), your definition is vacuous since to be self-consistent is to be 'true' in logic and mathematics.

In the real world, when someone says something is 'true' they are usually saying something about the world more than it is part of some self-consistent set of statements. For example, if I say that "'today I ate breakfast' is true" I am saying more than this is a self-consistent statement. Rather, I am saying that not only is it a self-consistent statement, but that I actually ate breakfast today.

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins