Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Silver Streak Philosophy

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on April 27, 2001 19:37:58 UTC


I agree that thought exists, but I think a lot more than thought exists (for example, my computer exists, so does my home, my car, my clothes, my sock, etc). I just don't think that we can phrase ontological knowledge (i.e., those things that exist) in terms of certainty or uncertainty. We have *no* absolute claims to ontological knowledge (either in terms of probability or in terms of sure knowledge), our knowledge is just reasonable assertions. Some claims are more reasonable (or more 'certain') than other claims, but no claim is more probable or less probable (although I catch myself using that phrase myself sometime - even though I believe it be inaccurate).

Warm regards, Harv

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins