Re: Of Course I Don't Want That For The World - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Re: Of Course I Don't Want That For The World

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Harvey on April 27, 2001 14:44:52 UTC

Hello Mario,

>>>Again, I don't debate religion's usefulness or integral status in human nature. I debate its foundations, yes.No. Science may not be perfect, but its tenets are provable.>Your belief is God has the same claim to truth as someone believing they have an invisible dragon in their garage.And frankly, I think your argument skirts the issue with distractions rather than focusing on the factual foundations for a belief in God.

Follow Ups:

On truth! - doctordick - April 27, 2001 - 18:05 UTC
- AKA Logic and Mathematics - harvey1 - April 27, 2001 - 20:31 UTC
  - Where do you want to start? - doctordick - April 27, 2001 - 21:55 UTC
    - Truth has an elusive meaning (but it does hold meaning)- - harvey1 - April 27, 2001 - 22:16 UTC
I think it's a disgreement on definition - stormcrow - April 27, 2001 - 18:51 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins