God & Science Forum Message | |
| Forums: |
Atm ·
Astrophotography ·
Blackholes ·
Blackholes2 ·
CCD ·
Celestron ·
Domes ·
Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem |
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place... The Space and Astronomy Agora |
| Not Totally Undefined
Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To Posted by Richard Ruquist on April 26, 2001 00:02:27 UTC |
You limit your set of data to data that is rotationally symmetric and shift symmetric.You state that very early in your developent. So your data is not totally undefined. It has constraints. But you want to believe that it does not have constraints. That is your privelege. But you certainly have not convinced me. Nowhere in the above post do you discuss the fact that you used shift symmetry or rotational symmetry. You assimed some basic symmetries and correct physics flowed out of it. Well, that has been know from a long time. That physics comes from symmetries. |
|
| Additional Information |
|---|
 |
| About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy |
|
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post. "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET" are trademarks of John Huggins |