"Thoughts Do" Would Work. - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

"Thoughts Do" Would Work.

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Paul R. Martin on April 14, 2001 00:31:13 UTC

I think the verb 'to do' captures the dynamism I wanted just as 'happen' does. My experience of thought is not static, like a marble statue. Instead it changes from one idea to another. I would have a hard time believing that anyone's thought just 'was' and did not 'do something'.

So I think an important implication from "Thought happens" is that reality changes in some way.

Warm regards,

Paul

Follow Ups:

How about "Thought occurs" - doctordick - April 14, 2001 - 14:27 UTC
- OK, but I still like 'happens' best - paulm - April 14, 2001 - 23:25 UTC
  - There are 2 kind of definitions. - alexander - April 16, 2001 - 18:33 UTC
    - Yes...but then what can you make of it? - paulm - April 16, 2001 - 21:40 UTC
      - Absolute truth? What is absolute truth? - alexander - April 16, 2001 - 22:26 UTC
        
        What I mean by it. - paulm - April 16, 2001 - 23:06 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins