Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Richard D. Stafford, Ph.D. on April 11, 2001 20:11:45 UTC


Most people try to construct a true false dichotomy from the supposed facts provided to them. As Godel pointed out, there either exists a third category or we have major problems with our logic. I have (for myself) named that third category as *meaningless. That completes the set so that I can now tag anything.

Before I can apply my tags to your statements, I need your definition of "self-consistency". In my head the phrase "laws of self-consistency" is categorized as meaningless.

By the way, I am glad you like this site, it is much easier to keep up with what is going on.

Welcome -- Dick

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins