What Do You Have To Replace Science? - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

What Do You Have To Replace Science?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by John Morgan Powell on April 4, 2001 17:09:07 UTC

If the best that natural scientists can provide to answer your questions about evolution appears "contrived and highly speculative", how contrived / speculative does the Genesis or other religious-based beliefs about life appear to you?

Follow Ups:

That is not the issue - isaiaha41 - April 4, 2001 - 17:51 UTC
- What can replace natural science? - johnpowell - April 4, 2001 - 22:32 UTC
  - Natural Science! - doctordick - April 5, 2001 - 15:51 UTC
    - F=ma is the DEFINITION of force. - alexander - April 5, 2001 - 17:12 UTC
    - Weight and mass - johnpowell - April 5, 2001 - 20:38 UTC
      - Weight as Force - doctordick - April 6, 2001 - 13:58 UTC
        
        "Again" says the little one. - johnpowell - April 6, 2001 - 16:45 UTC
        
        No real argument here! - doctordick - April 7, 2001 - 00:52 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins