Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Historocity Of Jesus

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Brian E. Sloan on April 4, 2001 12:31:38 UTC

Let's asssume that you are correct, that Nazareth did not exist at the time of Christ. [Leaving for the moment whether the evidence of its non-existence consists of lack of evidence or not]

This would seem to present as many problems for the skeptic as potential escape hatches. If the writers of the Gospels were trying to build a case for a new religion, then it would seem implausible that they would write a mythical town into the script. How would you answer this?

Also, I am in tacit agreement with the Missionary you encountered, in that the historocity of Jesus is as valid [if not more] as any of His contemporaries. You can not deny the existence of Christ, without in the same breath, denying the existence of Ceasor.

In the past, denying the existence of Christ was in vogue as grounds for skepticism. Increasingly though, the skeptics are finding themselves out on the proverbial limb, having to resort to simply denying the miracles of the Gospel [which is easy scince no one has seen one] or confining their arguments to peripherial issues such as this.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins