Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
A

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Forum Master on March 31, 2001 16:13:07 UTC

I, and many of my "godless" friends, suggest the logic that God is:

- At most the all powerful being.

and

- At least the sum of all natural laws.

Somehow the Natural laws got here. We can't observe how this happened since we are finite beings.

Scientific inquiry leaves room for doubt in every postulate. That is what peer review and other checks and balances in the scientific process help to resolve to the next step. This is why the scientific process works so well. However, even its proponents know that there is always room for additional refining of every idea. This is really the wonder of science - a never ending quest for more and more truth about our universe.

As for a proof of a God or proof that there is no god, we await futher evidence. Extraordinary claims call for extraordinary evidence, and the burden of proof is on the claimant.

Please give us your proof or simply a list of references to others.

John

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins