Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
The Ciceronian Ideal

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics
Posted by Benjamin Nelson on February 24, 2001 16:06:06 UTC


At first, I as inclined to write off most of the attacks on scholarly multiculturalism and the Humanities as the familiar if unedifying business of what Richard termed, "playing king of the hill." But recently this sort of play has been pushed outside the pale of polite discussion; the very words, used as labels, seem to be considered enough for this forum's rhetoricians to dismiss their opponents as defeated beyond redemption. And sadly, this wrath directed at the Humanities scorns the very kinds of intellectual distinction-making I hold most dear: respect toward rigorous education; reverence for history and philosophy; commitment to rationalism and scientific investigation.

After all, what counts in the sphere of public discourse is simply being able to use the language of culture in order to communicate any point of view -- scientific or otherwise -- effectively. Essential to this concept is the principle that the main features of even the most arcane scientific specialty can be explained to literate people. The moral dilemmas of our recent debate on cloning can be weighed. The implications of technological change can become subjects of informed public discourse -- not about technical details, but about the broad issues of the debate. And yet I have come across quite a number of nominally educated, if doctrinaire, people in this forum for whom the word "Humanities" is a withering insult, a debate-stifling dismissal, apparently on par with "dolt."

This academic rot is, alas, only the most flagrant manifestation of elitism, but it is the bane of democratic discourse. Therefore, we must be reminded that the inventors of democracy had in mind a Ciceronian ideal of education and discourse in a republic. Cicero claimed that he could explain Greek science to his fellow Romans in ordinary Latin terms -- and he did. And it was Thomas Jefferson who used these concepts in the Declaration of Independence. Indeed, the Ciceronian idea of universal public discourse must remain strong in this forum and elsewhere, otherwise we are in danger of falling victim to strong-armed intimidation.

B. L. Nelson

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins