Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: Ah, What I Like To Call The Irrelavent Infinite

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alexander on February 23, 2001 22:02:59 UTC

Yes, the problem is that philosophical education is based on feelings and historical examples, but not on logic and numbers. So for them stretching time (as it approaches the specific moment of crossing) to the infinity and then claiming that thus in reality time will never approach the crossing moment seems "logical".

The problem is that teachers and educators have more responsibility than someone else in shaping myths and misconceptions - students tend to believe teachers until many years later thay find that the teacher (and thus them too) was not right (and many students may never grow up and firmly believe in flat earth because teacher told so). I even know teachers who teaches physics with remark that "physics theories come and go, but the Bible stays"). And what do you think - his students firmly believe in Creation.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins