Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: Quasars Vs The Big Bang/OPAQUE??

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Greg Armel on June 15, 1999 17:52:04 UTC

yanniru: The inhomogeniuties in the 3K field did come from the amplification of quantum fluctuations at the moment of creation. But the moment of last scatter happened 300,000 years later and the 3K field we see today is just a 3000K snapshot of the inhomogeniuties in the universe at 300,000 years of age. Greg: Why is this 3000K snapshot of the primordial Universe unaffected by the subsequent heat from the intense radiation put out by 15 Billion years worth of Galactic formation that has taken place since the moment of "last scatter"? Quasars and Black-Holes for example put out jets of extremely intense radiation along the poles, so how does the 3K environment remain unaffected by the heat from these jets along the lines of their transmission? If there is any affect at all, 15 Billion years worth of galactic formation would severly distort your 3000K snapshot, expecially when you are only talking about a difference of less then .0900 of a degree!

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2019 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins