How does it prove eistein right is the question?

I am glad that you are brave enough to respond bladesinger,like I have said before I am not here to prove you wrong but the scientific concept of time , now there is much in einsteinian logic to discuss so for now this is as I see things so please do tell me if you agree with the following .

First all time related measurements have to rely on the earth sun calander principle else we could never account for truth in certain tests or universal distances .

So tell me what implications this would create if proven wrong, General relativity maintains that a clock runs faster at the bottom of a water tower and slower at the top of the water tower, I believe this was tested in the 60s with two very accurate clocks and also is backed by Hawkins .

Hawkins maintains that the same would apply if the clocks were substituted for a pair of twins and that the one living at the top of a mountain would become younger by a relative small amount yet noticable at great speeds , ie a light speed journey of a twin with another remaining on earth .

Do you agree , remember I am not testing you so please tell me what this would effect if proven wrong .

Regards

John Reyes

• Re: Re: Re: Re: Mental retardation. - alexander - February 5, 2001 - 18:09 UTC
  • Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Mental retardation. - skintless - February 5, 2001 - 23:32 UTC
    • Still mental retardation? - alexander - February 6, 2001 - 15:52 UTC
      • Re: Still mental retardation? - skintless - February 7, 2001 - 00:35 UTC
        • Time Delay in Towers - johnpowell - February 7, 2001 - 02:08 UTC
• Re: Re: Re: Re: Mental retardation. - bladesinger - February 6, 2001 - 08:24 UTC
• Hawkins and Experiments in the 60s - johnpowell - February 7, 2001 - 02:28 UTC