Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A Forum For Discussion - an Astronomy Net God & Science Forum Message

God & Science Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| God and Science \| Post	Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A Forum For Discussion

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Jim Schings on January 16, 2001 19:59:44 UTC

>There of course is no reason to believe that the channel is correct.<

Yes.

>It's great to have the perspective of a non-believer, or would you prefer to be called atheist, on the forum.<

Since you don't know much about my beliefs, "atheist" might be a bit of a jump.

Since I have never seen or heard of decent evidence of a god, at this time I just consider one an unproven concept. So I think agnostic would be closer to the truth.

>I am a physicist with quantum theories on
consciousness and afterlife. I have posted them on
this forum in the past. I would appreciate your opinion. I'd be happy to present them again for you.<

Fine. Since you mention it, could I ask in what capacity and where you are a physicist?

Jim

Follow Ups:

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: A forum for discussion - yanniru - January 16, 2001 - 23:23 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins