Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: The Mystic LAw.............

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by GwynJ on November 25, 2000 20:13:12 UTC

but where did the laws come from, especially as they apply to objects which have no power to reproduce themselves or direct themselves? is it enough to say 'that is just the way it is, the laws govern them and the objects and animals do as they are designed to do because it works'? if one can suffice to say 'the laws simply are', then why cannot it be said, too, that a governing 'entity' simply 'is' ?

not all 'laws' seem to be designed only for the maintenance and 'evolution' to the betterment of species. by 'law', humans have curiosity. we see much harm has come of curiosity that seeks destruction and seems to have a greater accelleration of success than curiosity that seeks to repair/edify.

or are laws defined as observations of those patterns and behaviors which exist but are exclusive of concern on the individual/collective impact of the behaviors overall? perhaps that is where i am amiss...

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2020 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins