Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
RE: RE: On Localized Flooding

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Sam on July 20, 2000 02:57:56 UTC

I am afraid the geological record is against you on this one. The continents, ocean, mountain upthrusts, and even the weather all point to a global catastrophie. Millions of creatures were buried alive instantly. Otherwise, we would never have had a fossil record to study because these creatures would have decayed before they would have had a chance to fossilize. The interpretation of the facts is the problem we have, not the facts themselves. Our interpretations are influenced by our biases. The question is: Which bias is most closely in tune with the facts. The Creation interpretation wins hands down. The problem with this is that people who reject this interpretation do not want to be accountable to an infinite God.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins