It seems that all those observations merely captures the event, but always after the fact? It seems that we can only make the connections, as logical as they may seem, after the fact. Our actions of logical arrangement or categorizing (a neurosis developed by obsessive cumpulsive behaviour due to...?) of these events makes me suspicious or what truly manifests our desire to understand these "after" facts. Is our imposition of symbolism through analogy the way to seek truth(s), god(s), et all, or is it all we truly have in terms of our limitations of understanding of ourselves and the universe?

Although...I do understand the decisive moments but how we justify it after is questionable.

Tön

• Analysis (breaking apart) needs to lead to synthesis - Lake - June 23, 2000 - 04:03 UTC