quick note:


physics of particles:


= logic of (piece of something bigger)s

but "logic" involves (e.g. "It is logical to go to movie "A" because today is the last day it screens) assuming "a piece of something bigger" (the desire to go to the movie "A" is bigger than the movie "A" as it assumes alternative options to going to movie "A") and a potential inverse particle ("going to movie "A" is smaller than or equal to movie "A" if movie "A" screens once only or more than once).

Logic involves exchanges of data among particles?

Axion: the particles bigger and smaller cancel.

Fermion: the scales are tipped.

Boson: the scales are balanced over bulk.

logic of particles: "particles" is axionic as requires more than one?

logic of particles emphasizes data accumulations or "the art of knowing"?

possibly connects to my post "light on dark matter" which said:

"the comparing of many observation perspectives while fixing a base-line that is itself entangled in the process of observation so producing an imaginary disturbance ("dark matter") which is actually the conservation of alternatives BY the observer!"

Black-hole = event horizon = "anywhere within limits" = space-time = number.


Universe = "uni verse" = a harmony

How could you count oranges if the oranges were not all oranges?

To count in the category "orange" requires a coherence among the oranges with the defining criteria of "orange".

If you apply logic to "black-hole":

logic assmues space in time (room to move in referent self-reference: e.g. it is logical to go to movie "A" because (self-reference: it is the last day movie "A" screens)(reference: and you can be present at the screening) (room to move: you don't have to go to movie "A").

black-hole = space in time.

Logic about black hole:

space in time about space in time

(anywhere within limits) "x2"

= potential for new harmony (new universe)!!!