Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
The Consensus Of Physicists

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Rowanda on February 16, 2005 14:09:20 UTC

is that dark matter does exist and that it is most likely composed of neutralinos that are quite heavy compared to the proton, hardly a candidate for a BEC medium. Several papers by Cahill from Australia and Moffatt from Canada claim that dark matter is just the fact (supposed) that Newtonian gravity, and therefore General Relativity, are based on spherical symmetry. But the physics community has ignored them.

However, recently Berenstein, a Professor at Harvard, has developed a new theory along the same lines that also indicates that dark matter is a figment of incorrect Newtonian gravity theory; and he is much too well respected to be ignored. His paper is in the Cornell archives and came out within the last few months. It was discussed extensively on the

So dark matter may not exist, and even if it does, it is not likely to be a BEC.

Sorry, wanda

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins