AnonyWandaqueen writes:
"Once again Mike attacks the person rather than debating the issue. Is that an admission that his arguments have no merit.


at http://www.astronomy.net/forums/god/messages/31913.shtml, Harv writes: "Wow, that's nasty"
That goes for Anonywandaqueen's post.

"Wandaqueen" is not a person but an anonymous name which could be a second or third identity of anyone here (though it is not Mike).

If anonymous correspondents can count as persons, it is possible for one person to have a whole army of persons "out-voting" what I wrote.
However, the integrity of what I wrote is unchallenged by anonyWandaqueen's impertinent statement. I did not attack any person.
Notice the positive sentiments I expressed in the note to the poster in question. Other correspondents here have made very strong negative statements about that same poster in the past few days; has AnonyWanda complained about those and called them personal attacks?
Real persons named Wanda may be wonderful
AnonyWandaqueen is just a fake name of someone who is bearing false witness.

• Mike - wandaqueen - January 23, 2005 - 04:11 UTC