Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Forum Master on October 31, 2004 04:00:18 UTC

Well, I guess my assumptions about the fossil record include the idea that plants that do not require bees or other animals to propagate existed before bees and other animals that do pollinate today.

Come to think of it, this is not really all that remarkable. These same plants that do not require participant pollinators exist today too.

Of course many plants do require active pollinators and these plants pull out all the stops to attract them with flowers, etc.

An interesting list exists here:

I believe the point of my bringing this up was to refute the poster's suggestion that plants need bees that's all.


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins