Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Opposits Attract, In All Things

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Joe Lynch on March 11, 2004 17:48:19 UTC

Could it be?

This may blow your mind, as it did with me when these thoughts first came to my mind. I'm not sure how long ago, that I first contemplated this, quite a few years, but it came back to me the other night, while watching a show about the string theory and the unified field theory, on Nova. Could it be, that the Unified Field Theory is right under our noses, so close that we cannot see it? Might gravity, electro magnetic, and the magnetic forces, all run off the same “fuel”, the fuel of opposites attracts. We all know that the north and south poles attracted, and most know that if you run DC electricity through coils you can make an electromagnet. A lot of us know that electrons move in a wire because of the positive\negative attraction. And a few even know that changing the direction that the current flows through those wires in the coil, reverses the polarity of that electromagnet.

So what if gravity works on the same principle, of opposites attract. All electron spin in the same direction around all nucleuses, which I suspect is a given. That means that the bottom of one atom has an electron moving in the opposite direction of the top of the atom below it. That works for the atoms beside it as well, since the electrons would be moving down on one, and up on the other. I know this is putting too simplistic, as electrons probably do not stay on one plane, but move more like with rolling up a ball of yarn, you rotate the winding circles on a third dimension, so that you get a spherical object, and not just a two dimensional object, like CD or role of tape, with the rotation being around one axis, and diplayed on the oth two. I will have to assume that this third dimension skewing of the rotational axis to wrap around, is the same with all atoms, like always rolling your ball of yarn the same way. All electrons would skew at the same rate, and this would just be one more opposite to attract the atom next to it.
Since we know that electron moving though a coil can produce the N/S fields, which can be used for attraction in an electro magnet, then why cant we see that the opposite direction of the spinning electrons might be causing the N/S and gravitational pull of everything to every other thing, on this earth, and every other body out there in this vast universe, which our good Creator fashioned.
Both run with the same rules or laws, distant decreases their effect, and size increases their effect. A larger magnet or electro magnet has more magnetic pull, and a larger body in space has more gravity, or larger gravitational pull. I have no way of figuring out if this logic works or not. So that is why I’m just throwing this ball out there, to see if someone with the right bat, (means to prove or disprove) and can hit this one out of the park.
If there were a way that we could reverse the direction that the electrons spin, would that not be antigravity. The electrons would be spinning in the same directions, when the top of one atom met the bottom of another. That would cause repulsion, hence anti-gravity.
If these far-out thoughts, which go through my head, turn out to be correct, and not just fanciful daydreams, then I feel that I should just be thankful for Him using me as His pen, and not take the credit. For it was God who blessed me with this mind, capable of learning all the preliminary stuff, giving me the ability to understand or think up this complex stuff. I am not well enough versed in my discernment skills, to say that He actualy taught this to me, but I give Him the credit, even if He did not purposely direct me to these conclusions.
Joe_born_again@yahoo.ca

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins