Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
It's More Like Science Is Anti-science

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Clerk on December 29, 2003 18:33:57 UTC

Because of my interest in the paranormal, I have read many reviews of the paranormal that label it as nonsense. Scientific American has a whole column devoted to that topic. The Sceptical Enquirer does the same with each issue.

Recently I found a site that cites two specific examples of the establishmnet of science, not the government, censoring scientific research: one about the paranormal and one about cold fusion.

The magazine NATURE, the most prestigious journal of all in science, contained a critical review of The Conscious Universe by Radin which presents evidence for the paranormal. The review was found to be incorrect, and told so by the author and a Nobelist, but NATURE refused to print the correction. You can read all about this at:

The subject of cold fusion has similarly been surpressed by the establishment to the extent that even if someone gets a cold fusion psper into the Cornell Archives, it is deleted by its moderators. You can read about this at:

So it naive for anyone to suppose that censorship can only come from the government.


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins