Paul, you agreed with anonymous Wandaqueen
when (s)he wrote that," "...the science establishment has closed down publication of such experiments. "
Paul,
Publication is not controlled by science.
Galileo was censored by the church AFTER his "science" colleagues went to the church to
complain about him.
When someone blames science for blocking free inquiry, I wonder if they notice who does NOT
control either the pursestrings or the printing presses.
Wandaqueen also wrote:"I question whether meaningful discussions of this sort can happen on this particular forum without interference from some of the posters here."
This is quite ambiguous. ?
Is Wandaqueen referring to the anonymous "secretary" who posts so many short, personally vindictive messages whose content is mainly to harrass with motive ostensibly to defend Wandaqueen from those who would converse on this forum about God and Science topics?

Warm regards,
Mike

• Voices/OBE/God/LAD - thewitt - December 29, 2003 - 02:45 UTC
  • Data is as good as its defined limit - quiet - December 29, 2003 - 19:15 UTC
    • Historical/"Scientific" knowlege - thewitt - December 30, 2003 - 03:11 UTC
    • Historical/"Scientific" knowlege - thewitt - December 30, 2003 - 03:12 UTC
    • Sorry about the double postings, my lap top is in heat. - thewitt - December 30, 2003 - 03:17 UTC
• It's more like science is anti-science - secretary - December 29, 2003 - 18:33 UTC
  • Publication is not controlled by science, not - secretary - December 29, 2003 - 18:38 UTC
    • Non Sequitury has something to say about the occult - quiet - December 29, 2003 - 19:21 UTC
      • Mike confused about the occult vs. the paranormal - secretary - December 30, 2003 - 13:48 UTC