Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Stupid Reason Did Not Read Far Enough

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Clerk on December 28, 2003 11:29:32 UTC

Pearson quoted Smith quoting Baez:

We find:
“Spin Networks are defined by Baez as "...graphs embedded in a manifold S (the space of spacetime) with edges labeled by representations of a Lie group G and with vertices labeled by intertwining operators. Spin networks define gauge-invariant functions on the space A of connections of any G-bundle over S...".

All Pearson had to do was to read two more small paragraphs to get a direct refutation of his stupid spacetime xy continum idea. Here is the relevant paragraph:

"The configuration space of gravity using the Ashtekar variables is not the space of metrics, but the space of connections on an SL(2,C) bundle (with compact real form SU(2) = Spin(3)) over S."

The key words are 'not the space of metrics'.

Mike will do anything to offset the idea that he does not know something. Mike owes Wanda an apology. He is very proud of his 99% in grade school. So what. That does not prove anything except that Mike is really screwed up. He talks about cattle and pasture pies. Is he just a dumb farmer???

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins