Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Try To Explain

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Tarvo on December 20, 2003 16:36:23 UTC

'He was dissapointed in it and felt it was "much ado about nothing".'

This is an example of understanding naturally without thinking, in other words he wanted to say that this is just about playing with words.

'Example: I succesfully mapped numerous physics laws by regarding, among other things, "electro-" as "generalisation " (or "category") and "magnetic" as "specification" (or "category intersection").'

Now you must show that there is no other useful way to map physics laws to show that it is not just playing with words.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2021 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins