Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
His Answers Have Been Amazing. You Buying Them?

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Whittier on December 16, 2003 02:01:51 UTC

William wrote to Secretary on this open forum
"Thank you for answering. Could you comment on other things too? Thanks."

He has, William. Are you going to bring out the
honest person in a person who wrote the following bales of stuff?
Secretary wrote ”I'm Anonymous Because You Won't Answer My Question or anybody else's. You make statements that you cannot back up when they are questioned. You are just a bag of hot wind, incapable of a lucid conversation because you cannot respond directly to anyone. You constantly sidetrack to avoid issues. Why not think before you post. Then they would not raise so many questions."
ReallY? Is that any reason to be “anonymous?”
This was posted. What was his answer?
Rawson wrote:
God Knows Who I Am And What I Am and he is pleased
In the third line at,
Rawson wrote:
I am an atheist

The dictionary definition of Atheist” seems to make Secretary’s claims into a 100% self-contradiction
Or see:
Rawson wrote: Pearson Said I Was A Quaker Not I. So he must be the liar.

Rawson had written::
I just live in Whittier's home town, and being in the same religion,

Just to be sure, I went back to the sources:
The First Words are “The Religious Society of Friends”

And in Whittier's Autobiography, in Letter form
Found at
Whittier himself writes.
Amesbury, 5th Mo., 1882Dear Friend :—I am asked in thy note of this morning to give some account of my life. (and a little later:”As a member of the Society of Friends, I …”

But Secretary, having claimed to teach about Whittier’s life and work,
should already know Whittier was a Quaker. So what was Secretary’s answer to all this? See his post in the archives in reply:

at Secretary explained:
“John Geanleaf Whittier Was A Quaker Not John Greenleaf Whittier
My big mistake”

Okay, William.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins