Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
You Said You Add Heat To Make Light, So Light Isn't The Source

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by M.W.Pearson on December 14, 2003 20:30:59 UTC

The comments I made were in response to
"William Witt" and his essay about light being the source which drives things. I wrote an alternate view.
Now, William writes:
"What about incandesence? Light can be "made" by converting electrons into photons by heating an element, or chemical conversion i.e. bulding a fire. the electrons thus converted give off other particals beside the photons (conservation of mass and energy) . Read a book on physics or electronics or mathmatics or something before you compose goofy theories without knowlege of past theories."
If you are adding energy to make light, then it would be difficult to use that as evidence that light is the source driving things.
Do you wish to remain anonymous, or would you like to tell us about your own "physics" background?


Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
Google
 
Web www.astronomy.net
DayNightLine
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins