Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
I Posted That Ape Thing Here Too ;)

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Whittier on December 4, 2003 02:03:56 UTC

But I wasn't using it rhetorically
to the extent you do.
The structure of what you write seems
to follow this pattern:
1) Cite some research and then jump to some conclusions by mysterious routes not spelled out.
2) Say Mike is immature and doesn't fit in with the research like, say, Aurino or Yutuist do.

The step you omit is the one where
you actually deal in *unbroken and fair (and balanced)
logical sequences (and lattices).

Oh well.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2018 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins