|
Ruquist writes: This Reminds Me Of Chinese Medicine But your development is so vast that it seems more like Mike Pearson's 'language as evidence ' theme.
Ruquist has not done anything as important to science as the person whose idea he is ridiculing -- and I already cited Antoine Lavoisier as the source.
Taken out of context, it would seem Ruquist
is fairly citing something I, Mike Pearson, wrote. But he is not. He is, metaphorically speaking, butchering what I wrote
without showing comprehension.
If Ruquist wants to mix rhetoric, debating tactics, and literary license with his science, that becomes his trademark.
Mike Pearson
|
