Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Such A Statement Is Illogical Even If There Were Not...

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Michael W. Pearson on November 23, 2003 02:59:09 UTC

Since Yanniru could not demonstrate the absence of anything by showing that he himself does not know of it.
As the Father of Modern Chemistry Antoine Lavoisier wrote,"It is impossible to separate science from language or language from science."

Uncareful word choice ruins many a construct if
rigor is being implied. It appears Yanniru is implying rigor but not choosing his words carefully. There seems little point in arguing with him, since what he said is indefensible on the face of it.

Follow Ups:

Login to Post
Additional Information
About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2022 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins