Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post
Login

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
The Statement WAS Incorrect - That Was My Point

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Aurino Souza on November 12, 2003 15:18:23 UTC

I was actually puzzled by your comment as it was clear to me we were in agreement from the start. On re-reading my post it occurred to me that it could be taken to mean the opposite of what I think:

"Essentially, if all human experience can be reduced to neuronal activity, then no human experience can possibly refer to anything other than neuronal activity, including the experience of physical objects. "

To me that means there's more to human experience than neuronal activity. That was my point. Sorry about the confusion.

Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    Google
     
    Web www.astronomy.net
    DayNightLine
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2024 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins