Back to Home

God & Science Forum Message

Forums: Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education
Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem
RSS Button

Home | Discussion Forums | God and Science | Post

Be the first pioneers to continue the Astronomy Discussions at our new Astronomy meeting place...
The Space and Astronomy Agora
Looks Like A CCD Chip

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Alan on November 3, 2003 03:08:09 UTC

Hey Harv,

That example I gave of your explanation of that thought experiment:

A results:

U, D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D
U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D, U,U

B results:

D, U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U
D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U,D,U, D,D

It looks like a CCD (charged couple device)?

In a CCD; information can only be obtained by shifting it along all the potential wells to the end and extracting it at the end.

There seems to be an issue re: the roles of "who goes first, who goes second" and "this" and "that".

Do you start with A or with B or both? By definition if you start with both they are in instant communication with you?

If one "goes first"; then A and B are defined not only as A and B but as for example "A first, B second".

But as they are also "A" and "B", not just "first" and "second"; A could have been second and B could have been first.



Follow Ups:

    Login to Post
    Additional Information
    About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy
    Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2023 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
    Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
    "dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
    are trademarks of John Huggins