Speculation:
If you look at the Leibnitz equation for pi:
pi/4 = 1  1/3 + 1/5  1/7 etc.
look at pi/4 as spacetime (4D) physics defined at "+ 1/5" as area (over 4) perhaps giving impression of pentagons curved by other terms in Leibnitz equation?
and look at the Dr. Dick idea of "circular reasoning in physics" with his partially differentiated simple 4 geometry; it may be quite easy to show why the universe may apear to be a closed finite space of curved pentagons stitched together.
Definitions:
two catagories intersecting can give a definition still zone where they intersect.
A sphere is multidirectional spin of linearspace (diameter). "Direction" involves "3" (as allows an option as to which division of the two divisions in 3 is first and which is second.)
One direction for a linearspace (that is one "3" of a "2") gives a 5ness when viewed by another? as the definition of the diameter (2ness) is tied up in the definition of its direction (its 3ness)?
The diameter (2) view of direction (3) might be called: charge (bias)(2ness view of 3ness)(electron goes from A to B: electron as "generalisation" : charge that we observe (from Feynman) is between a real electron and a real photon (that may form an electron positron pair from time to time): call "photon" : "comparison" then with "charge" as "bias" the bias is betwen a real generalisation (electron) and a real comparison.
In physics mapping they might be repeating ways of describing 5ness; and thus projecting an imaginary overall 2ness view of 3ness; by treating 5ness as area they might think it is pentagons on the surface of a sphere?
time: 3ness (e.g. clock hand has stationary origin as selfreferent point to refer move of hand: so selfreferent reference so 3ness)
distance: 2ness (from A to B)
directed distance: 3ness (a bias possible as with A,B,C what order? is described. A,B,C or A,C,B?)
directed distance per time: velocity: 3ness of 3ness: gives a twoview of 3ness: 5ness
velocity as 5ness
mass: togetherness: 2ness
momentum: mass velocity: mv: 2ness of 5ness
or 2ness of 3ness of 3ness
mv as 10ness?
3ness of 3ness: agreement on 3ness (maybe John Cramer's "offer wave; confirmation wave")
2ness of agreed 3ness: strings! number lines!
To count you need a "base" (agreement on common ground). 2ness of this looks like "counting in that base"?)
Why universe seem 90% dark matter? Speculation: A 10ness view of another 10ness view describing it as particles (3ness) in space (2ness) may generate 10 x 10 uncertainty (100) minus the current 10ness template giving 90% "dark matter"?
Why the inner 5% of the sun cooler and the next 5% warmer than expected? They say due to W.I.M.P. s (weakly interacting massive particles): actually if you look at the concepts "inner 5%; outer 5%; cool; hot; you might find it involves "how 5 is defined" relative "how next layer 5 is defined" and the mixing of the 5s (by regarding both as a "5") generates 5x5 = 25 generalisation which maybe by definition "cools" the "inner 5" (by giving it a more dense space in which to be defined???? )
dolphin
